← Research WP-05 CISOs · Pen Testers · Security Buyers

Red Team vs. ACSE — Full-Spectrum Attack Simulation

White-box adversarial evaluation with full architectural knowledge: linkability L=0.181, 107/107 detections, 0% post-mutation exploit success across 10 test categories

Abstract

This paper presents the complete methodology and results of an adversarial red team evaluation of PME v0.1.0. The evaluation assumed a sophisticated white-box adversary with full architectural knowledge, access to optimal attack algorithms, and an unconstrained tool set including Metasploit, Nmap, Wireshark, and Burp Suite.

Key Findings

6/6 red team test categories: PASS · Linkability L=0.181 — below random guessing floor of 0.500 · 0% post-mutation exploit success · 107/107 Forced Twitch self-identifications · 499/499 Defensive Leap tokens unique · 128.1-bit average Hamming distance · Power side-channel correlation: 0.03%

1. Test Scope and Attacker Profile

CapabilityDescription
Architectural knowledgeFull white-box — attacker knows complete PME architecture and mutation logic
Observation capabilityPassive capture of all traffic; arbitrary active probing
Computational resourcesUnlimited — optimal Hamming-distance linking algorithms
Tool accessMetasploit, Nmap, Wireshark, Burp Suite, custom Python
Attack durationUnbounded — attacker can observe as many cycles as required
Protocol knowledgeComplete ASMP/1.0 specification

2. Results

0.10.20.30.40.50.500 Random Floor0.215Sachs(Steady)0.138Hunter(Elevated)0.141Main Organ(Full Resp.)0.181CombinedAll Profiles0.500RandomFloorLinkability Score LLower = Better. L < 0.500 = Below Random Guessing Floor.Secure ZoneAll ACSE states achieve L well below the 0.500 random floor. An optimal attacker gains zero information.
Figure 1: Linkability Score L by State — all values below the L=0.500 random guessing floor
TESTRESULTTHRESHOLDSTATUSSachs UnlinkabilityL = 0.215< 0.600PASSHunter UnlinkabilityL = 0.138< 0.600PASSMain Organ UnlinkabilityL = 0.141< 0.600PASSCombined All ProfilesL = 0.181< 0.500PASSPower/Thermal Side-Channel0.03% correlation< 1%PASSForced Twitch Detection107 / 107100%PASSDefensive Leap Entropy7.9885 bits/byte≥ 7.9PASSDefensive Leap Uniqueness499 / 499 unique100%PASSCross-State Hamming128.1-bit avg≥ 128PASSLive Exploit Attempts (Metasploit)0% post-mutation0%PASS6/6 categories PASS. White-box adversary with full architectural knowledge and optimal algorithms.
Figure 2: Full Red Team Results — all 10 test categories
TestMethodResultThresholdStatus
Sachs unlinkabilityHamming-distance optimal linker, 9,000 obs.L = 0.215< 0.600PASS ✓
Hunter unlinkabilityHamming-distance optimal linkerL = 0.138< 0.600PASS ✓
Main Organ unlinkabilityHamming-distance optimal linkerL = 0.141< 0.600PASS ✓
Combined (all profiles)1,000 mutation sequences, 965/1000 unlinkableL = 0.181< 0.500PASS ✓
Power/thermal side-channelCross-correlation workload vs power0.03% deviation< 1%PASS ✓
Forced Twitch detectionCustom scanner self-identification test107 / 107100%PASS ✓
Defensive Leap entropyPer-token entropy measurement7.9885 bits/byte≥ 7.9PASS ✓
Defensive Leap uniquenessToken collision test, 499 tokens499 / 499 unique100%PASS ✓
Cross-state HammingBetween consecutive fingerprints128.1-bit avg≥ 128PASS ✓
Live exploit attemptsMetasploit / Nmap / Burp post-mutation0% success rate0%PASS ✓

3. Linkability Analysis

Linkability L measures whether an attacker can connect successive observations. L=0.5 is the random floor — equivalent to guessing. L=1.0 is perfectly correlated. The optimal linking algorithm achieved L=0.215 in Sachs state, L=0.138 in Hunter (below random guessing), L=0.141 in Main Organ. Combined: L=0.181.

Interpretation

L=0.181 means the attacker's optimal algorithm performs worse than random guessing. Each additional fingerprint observation degrades the attacker's model's relevance rather than improving it — because each new fingerprint is drawn from a statistically independent distribution.

Average Hamming distance between consecutive fingerprints: 128.1 bits — matching the theoretical expectation for two independent SHA3-256 outputs (expected: exactly 128 bits). This confirms PME's mutation is indistinguishable from independently sampled random values.

4. Forced Twitch Detection

Forced Twitch converts the attacker's primary reconnaissance tool — active probing — into a liability. PME detects probing patterns inconsistent with legitimate traffic and uses the probe itself to trigger surface mutation. Result: 107/107 attacker scanners self-identified. After each detection, the attacker's next probe observed a post-mutation surface, invalidating all previously collected data.

5. Live Exploit Attempts

  • Metasploit modules targeting pre-mutation surface: 0/12 succeeded post-mutation
  • Nmap service fingerprinting: all fingerprints invalidated within one mutation cycle
  • Burp Suite session token replay: all tokens expired at mutation cycle boundary
  • Custom payload delivery against staged vulnerabilities: 0% success rate post-mutation
Zero-Day Resistance

The Kali Invariant provides zero-day resistance independent of signature knowledge. An attacker exploiting an unknown vulnerability still faces a surface that expires before the exploit can be completed and staged.

Read the full formatted version:

Download PDF ← All Papers